Overall Rating: [4.0 / 5.0]
Honest Outlaw is a solid mid‑to‑upper tier firearms YouTube creator. He balances solid technical insight, hands‑on testing, and a relatively low level of political noise. Serious students of guns will find more value here than casual viewers.
Summary
Honest Outlaw (Chris “HO”) runs a YouTube channel focused on gun and gear reviews, list videos, and durability / torture testing. He claims to be independent of industry influence and positions his reviews as “for the people, not the industry.” Over time he has gained a following for being forthright with criticisms and not shying away from negative takes when warranted.
Evaluation Criteria
Content Quality & Accuracy
Honest Outlaw’s production is competent: decent camera work, clear audio, and solid editing. The videos generally stay on topic. He often does extended testing (e.g. 1,000 rounds) and revisits guns after break-in periods.
Where he sometimes stumbles is in the “list / ranking” style videos. Some viewers note those have more opinion and less depth. Also, in very technical or niche topics (e.g. advanced ballistics, rare guns) he may not dig as deep as specialist creators.
Firearms Knowledge & Credibility
Chris demonstrates real working knowledge of firearms, mechanical function, reliability, and ergonomics. When he criticizes or praises something, he typically gives reasoning, not just hype.
That said, he is not always the go‑to for extreme specialist topics (historical firearms, deep engineering) compared to channels devoted to those niches. But for modern defensive / carry guns and gear, he holds his own.
Viewer Engagement & Community Building
Honest Outlaw maintains a relatively friendly, down‑to‑earth persona. He does not appear to lean hard into “drama” or sensationalism. Many viewers comment that his videos avoid overt political slants.
He also mentions charitable causes (e.g. orphanages, shelters) in his content, which helps with community rapport. One downside: he does many “list / best of” videos, which tend to attract viewership but are lower in engagement (comments tend to argue rankings).
Bias & Transparency
Honest Outlaw makes an effort to signal independence from manufacturers. In forums, fans praise his transparency and willingness to call out issues.
However, as with any monetized channel, there are occasional product tie‑ins or promotions (e.g. gear videos), which can blur lines. Also, rankings (“best X”) inherently carry subjective bias, even when disclaimers are given.
Content Variety & Frequency
His catalog includes weapon reviews, gear reviews, durability tests, and “disappointment” lists (guns that underwhelmed). He also posts periodic “best of” videos (e.g. “5 Guns That Punch Above Their Price”).
He keeps a consistent upload rhythm, though not necessarily daily. The variety is good, though he leans toward handguns, defensive / carry weapons, and gear. He has less content in long arms, precision rifles, etc.
Influence & Industry Reputation
Within the firearms YouTube / “GunTube” space, Honest Outlaw is recognized and respected. Some fan communities compare him favorably to Hickok45 for his no‑nonsense style.
He is not as universally known as some higher‑subscriber channels, but among enthusiasts and potential gun buyers, his reviews often factor into purchasing decisions.
User Feedback Highlights
- “Content is fine … does pretty good reviews of new guns initially and then after 1,000 rounds. Hardly gets into politics.” – Reddit
- “One of the better video makers… reasonably entertaining and knowledgeable.” – This Armory Life
- “He has a lot of lists now … more opinion than substance.” – Reddit
We actively gather feedback from the broader firearms community to ensure our reviews reflect a range of real-world experiences.
Final Verdict
Honest Outlaw is a strong choice for gun owners seeking practical, real‑world reviews with moderate polish and minimal political noise. He is trustworthy and fair more often than not, though his style of “lists + rankings” means you should use his content as a guide, not gospel.
Leave a Reply